Willpower As Preference Bundling

Part Of: [Breakdown of Will] sequence
Followup To: [An Introduction To Hyperbolic Discounting]

Table Of Content

  • Motivations
  • Choice Is Not A Snapshot
  • Utility Anticipation
  • Preference Bundling
  • Takeaways

Motivations

Consider again the takeaways from our preceding post:

  • Behavior contradicting your desires (akrasia) can be explained by appealing to the rate at which preferences diminish over time (utility discount curve).
  • A useful way of reasoning about hyperbolic discount curves is warfare between successive “yous”.

With this model of akrasia in hand, we will proceed to explore: akrasia therapies, tactical countermeasures we employ to combat your “sin nature”.

How do people verbalize their struggle to preserve “perspective from a distance”? Well, excepting cases where their past selves deprive their future selves of freedom (think of Odysseus chaining himself to the ship), more often than not people gesture towards the concept of willpower.

Today we will build an account of what this fuzzy word actually means.

Choice Is Not A Snapshot

Do you remember our cartoon of a hyperbolic discount curve?  Here it is again:

Willpower- Choice Hyperbolic Example

Recall that the orange curge is LL (the larger-later reward), and the green in SS (the smaller-sooner reward). Akrasia occurs when some temptation transiently overpowers the choice we would otherwise select (when SS > LL).

Now this picture is, of course, extremely narrow.  We haven’t discussed:

  1. How this picture may be extended to greater than two choices
  2. How choices are differentiated at all (what prevents utility curves from being decomposed to smaller and smaller “choice units”).
  3. How a utility curve might be realized in the human brain at all.

I hope to get to these questions eventually. Today, I’d like to introduce just one “complication” into our cartoon: in real life, an organism must confront many choices across its lifespan.

Willpower- Choice Multiple

Utility Anticipation

Imagine your author waging an war-with-himself re: whether to stay up late researching, or get a full night’s sleep. Does the above graph comfortably fit in this category of recurrent choice?

One could argue that it fails: there is nothing to stop me from weighing the choices of my one-week-from-now self. To do this, I must represent their utilities in the present. Here’s how we might support such utility anticipation (only three examples shown, to constrain complexity):

Willpower- Choice Similarities

Does this anticipation counteract akrasia, instances where LL (larger-later reward) loses to SS (small-sooner reward)? To answer this, simply compare the utility curves:

Willpower- Foreknown Choice Selves

Akratic lapses persist. But if utility anticipation is not the root of willpower, what is?

Preference Bundling

Our innovation has its roots in philosophy.

Writers since antiquity have recommended that impulses could be controlled by deciding according to principle, that is, deciding in categories containing a number of choices rather than just the choice at hand. Aristtotle said that akrasia is the result of choosing according to “particulars” instead of “universals”. Kant said that the highest kind of decision-making involves making all choices as if they defined universal rules (the “categorical imperative”)… this also echoes the psychologist Lawrence Kohlberg’s sixth and highest principle of moral reasoning, deciding according to principle.

Imagine, for a moment, if we were to sum these utility curves together. Three time-slices should illustrate how this summing works:

Willpower- Foreknown Choice Addition (1)

Consider the middle time slice (middle rectangle). If you look closely, you’ll see it intersect three orange LL functions and the three green SS functions. If we sum the three LL values together, we arrive at a single (larger) LL value. Same story goes for the three green SS lines. The two circles directly over the rectangle represent these two sums.

In the above illustration, we bundled preferences at three particular times. But what is to stop us from doing the same computation at all times? Nothing, and after we do this, we obtain new utility lines. These lines represent the bundled utility curves of all three choices.

Willpower- Foreknown Choice Bundling (1)

(Why don’t we continue this addition for the entire displayed x-axis? Well, to preserve the effect, after Choice1 expires, you have to take into account Choice4, etc etc…)

Casting these bundled utility curves back to the language of successive selves:

Willpower- Bundled Choice Selves

In this situation, then, we see the defeat of akrasia – the victory of willpower!

Takeaways

  • Willpower is nothing more, and nothing less, than preference bundling.
  • Inasmuch as your brain can sustain preference bundling, it has the potential to redeem its fits of akrasia.

Next Up: [Personal Rule Feedback Loops]

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s